Tube Bender Scoring Methodology

Exact, unambiguous rules for how scores are calculated. When data is not published by the manufacturer, we score that category as 0 rather than guessing.

And it's not just rules on this page: every model's review shows the exact calculation for each category β€” how it scored, and the source behind the data. Open any review and expand β€œHow this score was earned.”

Scoring Overview

Our scoring system evaluates tube benders across measurable, objective criteria.

Total Points
100

Each bender receives a score out of 100 points across 14 categories.

Categories
14

Covering value, capacity, manufacturing, upgrade path, and advanced capability.

Scoring methods
Fixed-threshold tiersBinary scoringTier-based scoring

Current dataset maxima (auto-updating)

These values are computed from the current catalog + admin overlay data. If a new model is added with higher capacity/angle/wall, these numbers update automatically.

Max OD capacity (published)
2.500 in
JD2 Model 32
Max bend angle (published)
210Β°
RogueFab M625
Max wall @ 1.75" DOM (published)
0.875"
RogueFab M625

Note: the scoring engine uses fixed thresholds (not relative-to-max curves). The maxima are shown for transparency and update automatically with the dataset.

Detailed Category Scoring

1. Value for Money (20 points)

How much real capability and completeness you get per dollar for a typical starter system (frame + dies + power + stand).

Method: Scaled (fixed thresholds)Max 20 pts

What we score: how much real capability you get per dollar. We add up the capability points a machine earns in the other categories (67 possible β€” ease of use, diameter, bend angle, stress/materials, dies, upgrades, mandrel, S-bend, single-source, warranty), divide by its complete-system price (frame + dies + power + stand), and score the result on a fixed scale. A cheaper machine that still does a lot scores high; an expensive one that doesn't scores low.

Fixed scale β€” capability points per $1,000 (20 max)
  • β‰₯ 30 β†’ 20
  • 25–29 β†’ 17
  • 20–24 β†’ 14
  • 15–19 β†’ 11
  • 12–14 β†’ 8
  • 9–11 β†’ 5
  • 6–8 β†’ 3
  • < 6 β†’ 1 Β· no documented price β†’ 0
This scale is fixed and published β€” a machine's value score is reproducible by hand and never changes just because we add or remove other machines from the set.
On the stand/base: if a machine is stable and safe to use on a bench with no stand, we count the stand as $0. But if a machine requires a stand for safe use and the manufacturer doesn't sell one, we add a nominal $200 to its system price (a basic cart you'd have to buy or build). Pricing a mandatory-but-missing part at $0 would reward an incomplete offering by making it look cheaper than it can actually be owned. A machine in that situation also scores 0 on Single-Source, since you can't buy a complete working system from one place.

Data sources & verification

  • Manufacturer technical specifications, capacity charts, and manuals
  • Official product pages and documentation PDFs
  • Documented compatibility lists (dies/materials/upgrades)
  • If it's not published/verified, that feature scores 0 for that category

Looking for the per-product math? Open any review and expand Score math (diagnostic).

Browse reviews

2. Ease of Use & Setup (10 points)

Evidence-only checklist (0–7) plus portability/base configuration (0–3). No brand-based scoring.

Method: Tier-basedMax 10 pts

What we score: portability (0–3) plus an evidence checklist (0–7). No brand-based scoring. No subjective tiers.

A) Portability (0–3)
  • fixed β†’ 0
  • portable β†’ 1
  • portable_with_rolling_option β†’ 2
  • rolling_standard β†’ 3
B) Evidence checklist (1 pt each; 7 max)
  • Manual available (downloadable or explicitly included)
  • On-machine operation instructions/tips shown/promised
  • Built-in bend angle reference (scale/reference; loose magnetic cube does not count)
  • Springback / overbend help published: a specific overbend number (degrees / value / chart) OR a written method to measure springback and set the overbend. A vague "expect some springback" with no number and no method scores 0.
  • Rotation aid: chuck/indexer or clamp-on analog/digital (magnet-only scores 0; fails on non-ferrous)
  • Quick die change engineered aid documented
  • Official manufacturer YouTube instructional content for this exact model (top-10 YT results for BRAND+MODEL)
If it's not publicly documented or shown, it scores 0. No guessing.
Final = min(10, portability + evidence checklist).

Data sources & verification

  • Manufacturer technical specifications, capacity charts, and manuals
  • Official product pages and documentation PDFs
  • Documented compatibility lists (dies/materials/upgrades)
  • If it's not published/verified, that feature scores 0 for that category

Looking for the per-product math? Open any review and expand Score math (diagnostic).

Browse reviews

3. Max Diameter Capability (10 points)

Realistic maximum round tube size you can run on this frame with catalog tooling today. CLR ranges will be added to the math once every machine has documented CLR data.

Method: Scaled (fixed thresholds)Max 10 pts

What we score: maximum published round-tube OD capacity (maxCapacity). CLR is display-only (not scored) until CLR data is standardized across all models.

Exact point tiers (10 max)
  • β‰₯ 2.5 β†’ 10
  • β‰₯ 2.375 β†’ 9
  • β‰₯ 2.25 β†’ 8
  • β‰₯ 2.0 β†’ 7
  • β‰₯ 1.75 β†’ 5
  • β‰₯ 1.5 β†’ 3
  • > 0 β†’ 2
  • missing/unknown β†’ 0
Note: the dataset min/max shown on this page is for transparency only and does not affect scoring.
Current dataset OD range: 1.625 in (min) β†’ 2.500 in (max)

Data sources & verification

  • Manufacturer technical specifications, capacity charts, and manuals
  • Official product pages and documentation PDFs
  • Documented compatibility lists (dies/materials/upgrades)
  • If it's not published/verified, that feature scores 0 for that category

Looking for the per-product math? Open any review and expand Score math (diagnostic).

Browse reviews

4. Bend Angle Capability (9 points)

Maximum published bend angle in degrees (gross angle) for the machine + tooling. Missing angle scores 0.

Method: Scaled (fixed thresholds)Max 9 pts

What we score: maximum published bend angle in degrees. Missing or unpublished angle scores 0.

Notes:

  • This is gross maximum angle. It does not matter how many cycles, strokes, or re-indexing steps are required.
  • We only score angles that are explicitly published or otherwise documented for this frame/tooling.
  • Missing/unknown angle scores 0. We do not infer angles from photos, reputation, or "typical" expectations.
Exact point tiers (9 max)
  • β‰₯ 190Β° β†’ 9
  • 180–189Β° β†’ 7
  • 120–179Β° β†’ 4
  • < 120Β° β†’ 2
  • missing/unknown β†’ 0
Note: the dataset min/max shown on this page is for transparency only and does not affect scoring.
Current dataset angle range: 90Β° (min) β†’ 210Β° (max)

Data sources & verification

  • Manufacturer technical specifications, capacity charts, and manuals
  • Official product pages and documentation PDFs
  • Documented compatibility lists (dies/materials/upgrades)
  • If it's not published/verified, that feature scores 0 for that category

Looking for the per-product math? Open any review and expand Score math (diagnostic).

Browse reviews

5. Stress Capacity & Materials (10 points)

Published max wall thickness for 1.75" OD DOM (0–6), plus a simple count of documented compatible materials (0–4). Missing wall thickness scores 0 for the entire category.

Method: Scaled (fixed thresholds)Max 10 pts

What we score:

  • Published max wall thickness for 1.75" OD DOM (wallThicknessCapacity) β†’ 0–6 pts
  • Documented compatible materials list (materials) β†’ 0–4 pts
Hard rule: If wallThicknessCapacity is missing/unknown, the entire category scores 0 β€” we do not infer stress capacity from a materials list alone.
Thickness points (0–6)
  • β‰₯ 0.095" β†’ 1
  • β‰₯ 0.120" β†’ 2
  • β‰₯ 0.156" β†’ 3
  • β‰₯ 0.188" β†’ 4
  • β‰₯ 0.250" β†’ 5
  • β‰₯ 0.875" β†’ 6 (solid bar; half of 1.75" is 0.875")
  • missing/unknown β†’ 0 (entire category becomes 0)
Materials points (0–4)

We only count what the manufacturer explicitly documents as compatible for this frame.

Scored materials list (7 total): Steel, Stainless, 4130, Aluminum, Titanium, Copper, Brass (bronze counts in the Brass bucket).

  • 0 = Not listed
  • 1 = 1+ in list
  • 2 = 3+ in list
  • 3 = 5+ in list
  • 4 = 7+ in list (all covered)

Current dataset max wall @ 1.75": 0.875" (solid bar; RogueFab M625)

Data sources & verification

  • Manufacturer technical specifications, capacity charts, and manuals
  • Official product pages and documentation PDFs
  • Documented compatibility lists (dies/materials/upgrades)
  • If it's not published/verified, that feature scores 0 for that category

Looking for the per-product math? Open any review and expand Score math (diagnostic).

Browse reviews

6. Die Selection & Shapes (8 points)

Breadth of the die family: round tube, pipe, square, EMT, metric, plastic/urethane, and clearly documented "other" shapes.

Method: Tier-basedMax 8 pts
Tier mapping
Points equal the tier number (0–8).

What we score: documented die family coverage. One point per bucket, max 8 points. No documentation β†’ 0 for that bucket.

Buckets (1 pt each, 8 max)
  • Round tube
  • Pipe
  • Square tube
  • EMT
  • Metric round
  • Metric square/rectangular
  • Plastic/urethane pressure dies
  • Other documented shapes (e.g. hex, specialty profiles)

Data sources & verification

  • Manufacturer technical specifications, capacity charts, and manuals
  • Official product pages and documentation PDFs
  • Documented compatibility lists (dies/materials/upgrades)
  • If it's not published/verified, that feature scores 0 for that category

Looking for the per-product math? Open any review and expand Score math (diagnostic).

Browse reviews

7. Track Record (Years in Business) (3 points)

Documented operating history of the brand. This matters, but far less than performance and features, so we keep the weight modest.

Method: Tier-basedMax 3 pts
Tier mapping
Points equal the tier number (0–3).

What we score: published years in business when available. Missing or unknown scores 0. This category is intentionally low weight.

Numeric tiers (3 max)
  • β‰₯ 25 years β†’ 3
  • β‰₯ 10 years β†’ 2
  • > 0 years β†’ 1
  • missing/unknown β†’ 0

Data sources & verification

  • Manufacturer technical specifications, capacity charts, and manuals
  • Official product pages and documentation PDFs
  • Documented compatibility lists (dies/materials/upgrades)
  • If it's not published/verified, that feature scores 0 for that category

Looking for the per-product math? Open any review and expand Score math (diagnostic).

Browse reviews

8. Upgrade Path & Modularity (8 points)

Factory-supported power upgrades, length/rotation indexing, angle measurement, auto-stop, thick/thin-wall upgrades, and wiper-die support – one point for each documented upgrade.

Method: Tier-basedMax 8 pts
Tier mapping
Points equal the tier number (0–8).

What we score: factory-documented upgrade flags. Each documented upgrade is worth 1 point (8 max). Missing/unknown β†’ 0 for that flag.

Flags (1 pt each, 8 max)
  • Power upgrade path
  • Length stop
  • Rotation indexing
  • Angle measurement
  • Auto-stop
  • Thick-wall upgrade
  • Thin-wall upgrade
  • Wiper die support

Data sources & verification

  • Manufacturer technical specifications, capacity charts, and manuals
  • Official product pages and documentation PDFs
  • Documented compatibility lists (dies/materials/upgrades)
  • If it's not published/verified, that feature scores 0 for that category

Looking for the per-product math? Open any review and expand Score math (diagnostic).

Browse reviews

9. Mandrel Compatibility (4 points)

Documented support for mandrel bending on this frame (or a direct factory kit). No guesses; only what's clearly supported by the manufacturer.

Method: Tier-basedMax 4 pts
Tier mapping
Points equal the tier number (0–4).

What we score: the manufacturer's documented mandrel capability for this frame. If not documented, it scores 0. No guessing.

Exact mapping (4 max)
  • mandrel = "available" or "bronze" β†’ 4
  • mandrel = "economy" β†’ 2
  • anything else / missing β†’ 0

"Economy" means non-bronze mandrels (plastic/aluminum/steel). "Available/bronze" means a full bronze or equivalent factory-supported system.

Data sources & verification

  • Manufacturer technical specifications, capacity charts, and manuals
  • Official product pages and documentation PDFs
  • Documented compatibility lists (dies/materials/upgrades)
  • If it's not published/verified, that feature scores 0 for that category

Looking for the per-product math? Open any review and expand Score math (diagnostic).

Browse reviews

10. True S-Bend Capability (3 points)

Ability to make a true S-bend with ≀0.125" straight between opposing bends, proven by documentation or repeatable test pieces. Marketing photos with several inches of straight do not count.

Method: BinaryMax 3 pts

What we score: true/false for true S-bend capability. If it's not documented or not explicitly verified, it scores 0.

Binary (3 max)
  • sBendCapability true β†’ 3
  • false / missing β†’ 0

Definition: two opposite-direction bends with ≀0.125" straight (tangent) between them. Marketing photos with inches of straight do not qualify.

Data sources & verification

  • Manufacturer technical specifications, capacity charts, and manuals
  • Official product pages and documentation PDFs
  • Documented compatibility lists (dies/materials/upgrades)
  • If it's not published/verified, that feature scores 0 for that category

Looking for the per-product math? Open any review and expand Score math (diagnostic).

Browse reviews

11. USA Manufacturing Claim (2 points)

Scores only the strength of the maker's own "Made in USA" claim β€” a loose claim earns a little, a flat FTC-unqualified claim earns a little more. The real origin points come from Origin Disclosure.

Method: Tier-basedMax 2 pts

What we score: only the strength of the manufacturer's own β€œMade in USA” claim β€” the words they publish. Not a legal opinion, not a factory audit. The real origin points come from Origin Disclosure below.

Points
  • 2 β†’ Flat β€œMade in USA” (no fine print, no imported parts disclosed).
  • 1 β†’ Qualified/loose claim (β€œAssembled in USA,” β€œAmerican made,” or β€œMade in USA” with imported parts disclosed).
  • 0 β†’ No USA claim (imported, foreign, or silent).

Data sources & verification

  • Manufacturer technical specifications, capacity charts, and manuals
  • Official product pages and documentation PDFs
  • Documented compatibility lists (dies/materials/upgrades)
  • If it's not published/verified, that feature scores 0 for that category

Looking for the per-product math? Open any review and expand Score math (diagnostic).

Browse reviews

12. Origin Disclosure (8 points)

The real origin points: one for each major component (frame, dies, hydraulics, motor, controls) whose specific origin the maker documents. Rewards disclosing where parts come from β€” USA or imported both count β€” not any particular country.

Method: Tier-basedMax 8 pts

What we score: how much of the machine's origin the maker actually documents. Country-neutral β€” disclosing that a part is imported earns the point just the same as disclosing it's USA. Hiding it earns nothing.

One point per documented component (8 max)
  • Frame +2 Β· Dies/tooling +2 Β· Hydraulic/power unit +2
  • Pump/motor +1 Β· Controls/electronics +1
A part the machine doesn't have (e.g. no hydraulics on a manual bender) isn't counted against it.

Data sources & verification

  • Manufacturer technical specifications, capacity charts, and manuals
  • Official product pages and documentation PDFs
  • Documented compatibility lists (dies/materials/upgrades)
  • If it's not published/verified, that feature scores 0 for that category

Looking for the per-product math? Open any review and expand Score math (diagnostic).

Browse reviews

13. Single-Source System (2 points)

Binary: can a normal buyer obtain a complete, fully functional bending system (frame + dies + hydraulics/lever) from one primary manufacturer/storefront, or not?

Method: BinaryMax 2 pts

What we score: whether a normal buyer can obtain a complete, fully functional bending system from one primary storefront/manufacturer β€” specifically: frame + dies + the required power/actuation (hydraulics or lever), plus the stand/base if it is required for normal use.

Binary mapping (2 max)
  • 2 points β†’ full system available from one primary source, and the system is sold as a coherent platform under that source (no required "go elsewhere" components).
  • 0 points β†’ anything else (missing key components, requires sourcing elsewhere, or unclear completeness).

Data sources & verification

  • Manufacturer technical specifications, capacity charts, and manuals
  • Official product pages and documentation PDFs
  • Documented compatibility lists (dies/materials/upgrades)
  • If it's not published/verified, that feature scores 0 for that category

Looking for the per-product math? Open any review and expand Score math (diagnostic).

Browse reviews

14. Warranty (Published Terms Only) (3 points)

Warranty strength based strictly on the published terms (coverage and duration). We do not score how well the warranty is honored in practice.

Method: Tier-basedMax 3 pts
Tier mapping
Points equal the tier number (0–3).

What we score: published warranty terms only (tier 0–3). We do not score how well a warranty is honored.

Tier mapping (3 max)
  • 0 = no meaningful written warranty / sold as-is / not mentioned
  • 1 = short, limited, or vague coverage
  • 2 = clear ~1–2 year coverage
  • 3 = clear multi-year or lifetime frame/structural coverage

Data sources & verification

  • Manufacturer technical specifications, capacity charts, and manuals
  • Official product pages and documentation PDFs
  • Documented compatibility lists (dies/materials/upgrades)
  • If it's not published/verified, that feature scores 0 for that category

Looking for the per-product math? Open any review and expand Score math (diagnostic).

Browse reviews

Transparency & Verification

All scoring is based on publicly available manufacturer documentation and verifiable claims. If a capability is not published or cannot be verified, it scores 0 for that category rather than relying on assumptions.

Data sources

  • Manufacturer technical specs and capacity charts
  • Product manuals and official documentation
  • Company founding dates and history
  • Clarification from support and sales teams

Scoring verification

  • Cross-checks across multiple official sources
  • Conservative scoring when data is incomplete or ambiguous (0 points rather than guessing)
  • Individual product pages expose per-category breakdowns so you can inspect each score.